It's obvious that the Catalyst was designed to be entirely self-contained with no need to use a laptop or anything to pull data off. The software on the tablet is very easy to use. This is actually promising to me as it implies there is active development behind the product. I updated the software twice - once when I first connected it, and then again a few days later when another bug-fix release came out. The software recognized my 2.4GHz wireless router, but not the 5G one.
Racerender alternative android#
The tablet itself is running a pretty old version of Android (6) but it isn't really a factor since the software package only allows you to run the Garmin software.
The cable is pretty long so can be hidden behind headliner etc.Īn additional USB cable is run from the magnetic mount to one of the two power supplies (hard-wire or socket USB). Out of the box, some 3M sticky cable routing guides can be used to route the cable around the windshield to prevent it from blocking the field of view. The camera itself does not have a battery built into it, so you must run a cable from it to the power brick attached to the magnetic mount:
You also get a hard-wire cable that you can directly wire into your car's power supply, as well as a 12v socket plug and corresponding USB cables. I don't imagine it's going to come off unless you hit it hard - I spun out and it stayed fixed.
A pretty sturdy RAM mount is included, which has a magnetic quick-release that holds the tablet pretty well.
Racerender alternative 1080p#
In the box, you get the tablet, and 1080p 30 fps quality camera with a polarized lens cap to cut down on windshield glare. However, I feel AIM has dropped the ball with the AIM Solo 2 DL since there are numerous quality of life things they forgot to include (USB connector, hello? Another power cable for 12v socket?). I'm a pretty big AIM Solo DL fanboy, as the data analysis and tight data integration with all of my cars makes for an invaluable tool. Anything that can improve my laptimes will get serious consideration. And to be honest it's more likely to have worse results than using the previous common mapping method.I saw this when I was shopping for a new helmet, and I had heard about it and was curious about its capabilities. The only problem might be with proper geotagging of such result map. Second alternative is more easy and not very common: Record a video file and use a pushbroom method for a map creation using I have not tested this method but it looks much more easy to do. and create a georeferenced mosaic and export the mosaic to GE KML or any GIS format like TIFF that you can open with QGIS for e.g. So first plan a mission for systematic mapping. Then by using some photogrammetric SW like Photoscan you can create a georeferenced mosaic that can be exported to Google Earth or any true GIS SW for a review or further analysis. After the flight you can take a gps positions from a flight log and geotag images taken from camera. In that case all you need is a camera that can do this and a drone (fixed downward position for a fixed-wing or downward looking gimbal for multirotor) and a Pixhawk with GPS. But you are most probably referring to a georeferenced mosaic that you can create from a set of systematically fired shots through some intervalometer device, CHDK script or internal camera feature.
Racerender alternative how to#
I don't know how to create a georeferenced video file, I have not seen such application yet.
0 kommentar(er)
